View

Participatory Planning for Diversity: Treasure Hill Urban Conservation in Taipei and its Public Policy Implications

  29 September 2016
 3.00pm – 5.00pm. Registration from 2.30pm, seated by 3.00pm 
 MND Auditorium

---

Resources

Lecture Poster (PDF: 724KB)
Lecture Report (PDF: 1.43MB)
Lecture Transcript (PDF: 134KB)

Lecture Video & Photos

---

Synopsis

Slated for demolition in the 1980s, Treasure Hill was formerly an illegal settlement of urban farmers in Taipei. Faced with this circumstance, in a bid to preserve the sense of community there, a group of scholars and civil society organisations assumed a civil society partnership role and called on the government to designate Treasure Hill as a ‘settlement preservation area’. In a turn of events, in 1990, the initial plans were changed and it was decided to preserve the settlement as an ‘arts community exhibition area’ with the aim of revitalising this historic community. Using this example of urban conservation in Taipei, Prof Liu will share his involvement and insights on public policy implications, as well as the growing need to find meaningful ways to allow users and stakeholders to participate in the formation of plans and designs in urban planning

Lecture Report

Slated for demolition in the 1980s, Taipei’s Treasure Hill was an illegal settlement of urban farmers and Kuomingtang veterans. In a bid to preserve the community, a group of scholars and civil society organisations took on a partnership role and called on the government to designate Treasure Hill as a “settlement preservation area”. Today it is an example of a revitalised and distinctive community with a sustainable ecological masterplan.

 

Professor John K C Liu of the Building and Planning Research Foundation was one of the key actors in this movement. A champion of participatory planning — the urban planning paradigm that emphasises the entire community’s involvement in urban planning processes, Prof. Liu has worked on more than 500 related projects in over 25 years.

 

Describing some of these projects to a CLC Lecture audience, the professor outlined some distinct features. They usually run up to no more than USS10,000, with a strict 30:70 rule where 30 cents to every dollar is spent on training while the rest goes to capital expenses on the actual work.

 

Examples of such projects range from restoration of roofs to the transformation of empty compounds into children’s playgrounds. In one instance, an abandoned house that was first considered for solving a pedestrian issue, through community participation, was transformed for another function; the community took over and used it as a kitchen where the elderly would cook together and serve meals.

 

Today Prof. Liu sees a growing need to find meaningful ways for users and stakeholders to participate in urban planning and design. “Greater social equity and justice can be gained when people are able to participate in [the] design process,” he said. “You need to bring people directly into the decision-making. Even if the final plan isn’t perfect, people [will] identify with it and [be] willing to take care of it.”

 

What about Singapore? Is it ready for such participatory planning? Prof. Liu replied, “[It] seems to me the government here in Singapore is carrying a lot of the burden; everything is on the shoulders of the government. It is a well structured and working society. But faced with challenges of population growth and transition into a more democratic system, the role of civic institutions needs to be more apparent.

 

“The opportunity I see is that there is a great strength in multicultural interactions here. There is a great deal of respect and appreciation for cultural differences. And there is very strong and working law and order. Today, Singapore is leading in Asia in the economy, and it is resource-driven; it can innovate, spur and create.”

---

About the Speakers

 

 

Events

• Science of Cities Symposium
• World Cities Summit
• CLC Lecture Series
• CLC Webinar Series
• Other Events